I think at some point in time, every boy wonders about what it must be like to have breasts. After time, some of us grow past this stage and are able to see a woman as an individual and not just someone who has strangely exciting body parts. For others...well, not so much growth is achieved.
How the woman get jam so? Uproar in the nation, UNC-Alliance mad tuh treat Kamla so. She was Bas girl! He protoge! The Robin tuh his Batman! She get embrace and then disgrace.
Undoubtedly, if elected Leader of the UNC-Alliance, Kamla would have wielded immense power. And she had more than enough support within the party if it took 5 hours of deliberations to come to a decision other than Kamla at the helm. The current joint leadership is a sham. Warner is the financier, the money. If Jack threatens to leave, where does new money come from? Not just new money, but new money equal to Jack's? Hmmm.....
In the now infamous rally, Kamla said "I want to tell my political enemies close to me and far away that Kamla is a woman who gets knocked down, but she gets up again and they are never going to keep me down."
Yes Kamla, play dead tuh catch corbeaux live. But is two ah dem ent?
Aite, de corbeaux have de money, but what about de silverfox?
Ahhhhhh, she forget silverfox.
Silverfox bring back Ramesh.
Ramesh and Kamla don't talk at all, at all, at all.
Tuh use 'hate' is tuh treat it lightly. Look Kamla and Jack was talking on de campaign trail after d whole leadership stink, sharing seat next tuh each other and ting.
Ramesh and Kamla...dat and ah big belly fowl yuh will nevah see!
So, if Bas jus taking one more run, and after him only Kamla was really lineup in d party tuh take he place, why bring back power-hungry, party-splitting Ramesh?
There is a young, fresh candidate for Oropouche West. An engaging lawyer, educated in Britain who goes by the name of Mickela Panday. She is young, so she lacks political experience, but she definately has her father's charisma. With a few more years, and his guidance, she will be a most formidable opponent. A few years. She secures her seat in this election, Ramesh and Kamla waste time fighting each other, once again splitting the party leaving Mickela to rise like a Phoenix from the ashes.
Or I could be mad, I mean after all it is just speculation...right?
Friday 26 October 2007
Thursday 25 October 2007
executive president Manning
"Political leader Patrick Manning has declared his intention should he win, to change the constitution of T&T, to become Executive President."
The idea behind the above statement has been waved in true Red Pill fashion all over the news and on the campaign trail. Kamla say she get a draft constitution sent to her in secret. Legal Affairs Minister Christine Kangaloo in turn, denies it.
Currently in Trinidad and Tobago, the following criteria must be met for a legal and binding constitutional amendment to take place.
1. A three-fourths majority is need in the House of Representatives. In an electorate consisting 41 seats, this translates roughly as 31 seats. This majority can be achieved by right, as in winning an outright number of seats in an election to have the majority, say PNM wins 31 seats. The majority can also be achieved by consensus; say PNM-20, UNC-11, COP-10, and the COP supports the amendment, thus a consensus is reached.
2. A two-thirds majority is then needed in the Senate. There are currently 31 Senators in a constitutionally set ratio of 15 Government; 6 Opposition; and 9 Independents(appointed solely by the President). Under a 2/3s majority, 21 Senators are needed to support the amendment, thus this majority has to be by consensus.
As it stands, no one knows if President Max Richards will support such an amendment if the PNM manages to secure both of these majorities.
His term ends on March 19th, 2008.
At that time, a new President will be appointed. It is here that the Prime Minister at the time can appoint someone who will carry out his 'wishes'. Opening the room for this new President to appoint 9 Independent Senators who may simply be selected to carry out the 'Executive President Amendment Agenda' (my term...I like how it soun!)
However, will the PNM secure 31 seats in the general election? What if they don't, which party will align themselves with the PNM on this issue in order to get the amendment passed?
The issue of Constitutional Reform and any change in the system of government is definately an issue that an entire nation needs to take notice of, and should be involved with. The government says that its proposal is still in the draft stages, a work in progress if you will. Rather than frighten people with dark scenarios, why is no political party calling for a nationwide referrendum on the issue? We are gearing up for an election are we not? If the voice and thoughts of the people is what matters, why not seek their opinion, at least, at this stage?
No. No opinion is sought.
Instead, it seems all parties involved would prefer to give our opinion to us.
make a choice, use yuh voice...
The idea behind the above statement has been waved in true Red Pill fashion all over the news and on the campaign trail. Kamla say she get a draft constitution sent to her in secret. Legal Affairs Minister Christine Kangaloo in turn, denies it.
Currently in Trinidad and Tobago, the following criteria must be met for a legal and binding constitutional amendment to take place.
1. A three-fourths majority is need in the House of Representatives. In an electorate consisting 41 seats, this translates roughly as 31 seats. This majority can be achieved by right, as in winning an outright number of seats in an election to have the majority, say PNM wins 31 seats. The majority can also be achieved by consensus; say PNM-20, UNC-11, COP-10, and the COP supports the amendment, thus a consensus is reached.
2. A two-thirds majority is then needed in the Senate. There are currently 31 Senators in a constitutionally set ratio of 15 Government; 6 Opposition; and 9 Independents(appointed solely by the President). Under a 2/3s majority, 21 Senators are needed to support the amendment, thus this majority has to be by consensus.
As it stands, no one knows if President Max Richards will support such an amendment if the PNM manages to secure both of these majorities.
His term ends on March 19th, 2008.
At that time, a new President will be appointed. It is here that the Prime Minister at the time can appoint someone who will carry out his 'wishes'. Opening the room for this new President to appoint 9 Independent Senators who may simply be selected to carry out the 'Executive President Amendment Agenda' (my term...I like how it soun!)
However, will the PNM secure 31 seats in the general election? What if they don't, which party will align themselves with the PNM on this issue in order to get the amendment passed?
The issue of Constitutional Reform and any change in the system of government is definately an issue that an entire nation needs to take notice of, and should be involved with. The government says that its proposal is still in the draft stages, a work in progress if you will. Rather than frighten people with dark scenarios, why is no political party calling for a nationwide referrendum on the issue? We are gearing up for an election are we not? If the voice and thoughts of the people is what matters, why not seek their opinion, at least, at this stage?
No. No opinion is sought.
Instead, it seems all parties involved would prefer to give our opinion to us.
make a choice, use yuh voice...
Wednesday 24 October 2007
Red Pill Politics
When it comes to rabbit holes, everyone has basic choice. Either you go into the rabbit hole to find truth (blue pill), or you choose to stay in Wonderland with its well-manicured lawns and all-inclusive fetes (red pill). The choice of the red pill, then, means that reality is not wanted. Red pill users don't want to deal with everyday situations. For them, life is the constant fete; how they vote IS how they party. These are the masses, the crowds that politicians pander to and play for. Red pill users form the bulk of diehard, card-carrying, 'juhsey' wearing supporters. Whether it be balisier, the rising sun, or a bullseye for a cross-eyed man, whatever emblem you waving, once you waving it, red pill politics is for you.
When your choice of leader can work you up into a frenzy with a vague promise to control crime, you have taken the red pill. When your logic is suspended so that you believe that by increasing spending on prisons and nothing on social programs, criminal elements would be magically controlled, you have been red-pilled. A red beret appeals to the red pillers, so too do secret polls and walks around the community. A red pill solution is only temporary and based in the non-real, the imaginary, in Wonderland. Our roads are a mess, every party speaks of infrastructure, which is a concern. But any driver on our roads know that the main problem is driving mentality. The measures of wider lanes, rapid rail or ferry will not address this. Man does stop car on d highway like how tantie does stop in d market. Jes "BRAPS!", drop all she bag, and eh even realize ah whole family of 4 was behind her. In the market, it provides for a light Sunday morning moment to make you think of ole time days. On the highway...
We have many drug-related shootings, and now political shootings have begun. Last week in Enterprise, a young man who was a welder and a part time poster-boy for one particular party was shot to death. Two men in a car drove up to him and opened fire, when he fell, one man got out, stood over him, and emptied his gun into the young man's motionless body. Red pill politicians scrambled to release statements expressing remorse and concern for the family left to mourn. Yet to this date, has anyone visited the family, or offered any real help? What about members of the party that he was working for? The young man was his family's main breadwinner. As they all vie for power and first place, each trying to appear more compassionate, none of them ever gets close to helping the family in a meaningful way.
A favourite of the red piller is the question, "So who yuh votin' for?" Which is always rhetorical. There is only one right answer to this, and it can only be the acronym for the particular party that the red piller addressing you at the time supports. Now as a blue piller, you will know that there is no real difference between the parties. That everything focused on showing difference is all a sham. A red piller does not see this. Minor discrepancies become ideological gaps. Somehow, we end up with African and Indian parties in a land forged from the love of liberty, where every creed and race supposedly find an equal place. And how is it, with Trinidadian society in consideration, do the demands of any of these groups truly differ?
The good thing about red pill politics is that you always have choice.
YOU can choose to take a blue pill one morning, but it may make the choice of going back difficult.
YOU can choose to talk to your fellow Trinidadians and see commonalities rather than differences.
YOU can choose!
When it comes to elections, don’t allow the illusion of making a choice be the definition of what you do for your country. A once every 5 years choice is not voice, and voice is what democracy is about.
“Bluuuueee, We go paint d tong Blueeeeee
Turn d wholeworld upside down!” – 3 Canal
When your choice of leader can work you up into a frenzy with a vague promise to control crime, you have taken the red pill. When your logic is suspended so that you believe that by increasing spending on prisons and nothing on social programs, criminal elements would be magically controlled, you have been red-pilled. A red beret appeals to the red pillers, so too do secret polls and walks around the community. A red pill solution is only temporary and based in the non-real, the imaginary, in Wonderland. Our roads are a mess, every party speaks of infrastructure, which is a concern. But any driver on our roads know that the main problem is driving mentality. The measures of wider lanes, rapid rail or ferry will not address this. Man does stop car on d highway like how tantie does stop in d market. Jes "BRAPS!", drop all she bag, and eh even realize ah whole family of 4 was behind her. In the market, it provides for a light Sunday morning moment to make you think of ole time days. On the highway...
We have many drug-related shootings, and now political shootings have begun. Last week in Enterprise, a young man who was a welder and a part time poster-boy for one particular party was shot to death. Two men in a car drove up to him and opened fire, when he fell, one man got out, stood over him, and emptied his gun into the young man's motionless body. Red pill politicians scrambled to release statements expressing remorse and concern for the family left to mourn. Yet to this date, has anyone visited the family, or offered any real help? What about members of the party that he was working for? The young man was his family's main breadwinner. As they all vie for power and first place, each trying to appear more compassionate, none of them ever gets close to helping the family in a meaningful way.
A favourite of the red piller is the question, "So who yuh votin' for?" Which is always rhetorical. There is only one right answer to this, and it can only be the acronym for the particular party that the red piller addressing you at the time supports. Now as a blue piller, you will know that there is no real difference between the parties. That everything focused on showing difference is all a sham. A red piller does not see this. Minor discrepancies become ideological gaps. Somehow, we end up with African and Indian parties in a land forged from the love of liberty, where every creed and race supposedly find an equal place. And how is it, with Trinidadian society in consideration, do the demands of any of these groups truly differ?
The good thing about red pill politics is that you always have choice.
YOU can choose to take a blue pill one morning, but it may make the choice of going back difficult.
YOU can choose to talk to your fellow Trinidadians and see commonalities rather than differences.
YOU can choose!
When it comes to elections, don’t allow the illusion of making a choice be the definition of what you do for your country. A once every 5 years choice is not voice, and voice is what democracy is about.
“Bluuuueee, We go paint d tong Blueeeeee
Turn d wholeworld upside down!” – 3 Canal
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
